| Am. J. Biomed. Sci. 2009, 1(4), 373-384; doi: 10.5099/aj090400373 |
Radiofrequency Dosimetry in Subjects Implanted with Metallic Structures
Undergoing MRI: a Numerical Study |
|
E Mattei1, M Triventi1, G Calcagnini1, F Censi1, and P
Bartolini1 |
|
1 Department of Technologies and Health, Italian National
Institute of Health, Roma, Italy |
|
*Corresponding Author: |
|
Abstract A numerical
study to investigate the effects of the exposure to radiofrequency (RF) field
on biological tissues implanted with thin metallic structures has been carried
out, using the finite difference time domain (FDTD) solution technique. The
particular case of the RF used in the clinical 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) scanners has been studied. The results of the model show that the presence
of a metallic wire yields to a significant increase in the local specific
absorption rate (SAR) and in temperature around the implant. Present standards
or guidelines do not specifically address this problem and use threshold levels
and methods to define safe exposure conditions that cannot apply to reveal high
SAR gradients, such as the ones generated by thin metallic implanted objects.
In particular, an averaging mass of 10 g, typically used for SAR calculation to
evaluate the effect of RF exposure of biological tissues, is too big if
compared to the SAR gradient generated by thin metallic structures. The SAR
estimation according to this method cannot be considered a reliable indicator
to evaluate the potential damage due to the RF induced heating at the interface
between the implant and biological tissues. Five wires of different lengths and
thicknesses were simulated and the SAR at the wire tip was evaluated over 10g,
1g, 0.1g averaging mass: the SAR underestimation related to the 10g and 1g
masses, compared to 0.1g mass, was greater than 90% and 60%, respectively. In
conclusion, present standards cannot be applied to thin metallic implants. The
amount of averaging mass should be chosen as a function of the dimension of the
implanted object and of the SAR gradient that is generated around it. At the
same time, the averaging volume has to be not too small to be just a single
"hot spot", not relevant for the evaluation of potential tissue damage due to
RF exposure. Keywords: MRI; RF field; RF heating; SAR; implantable devices. Download the full article (PDF)
|
© American Journal of Biomedical Sciences 2007.
All Rights Reserved.